In Re LW’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2007
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 151 N.C. App. 94 - In Re Anderson · 164 N.C. App. 176 - In Re JD · IN THE MATTER OF JD · In Re TW · 166 N.C. App. 222 - In Re JAO
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“some evidence that tended to show that respondent's mental health issues and the child's neglect were so intertwined at times as to make separation of the two virtually, if not, impossible.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the substance of the trial court's reasoning, not specific citations to or allegations of dependency.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the issues that were present throughout the permanency planning reviews and that culminated in the termination order were intertwined in such a way as to obviate consideration of the termination order without concurrent consideration of the mental issues that were present.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re C.D.A.W.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.