623 So. 2d 1228 - State v. Christopher’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2007
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Arizona v. Hicks · Bisaillon v. Sureck · W O R Z., Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission · United States v. Hosford · Shargaa v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the practice of acting as prosecutor and witness is not to be approved and should be indulged in only under exceptional circumstances”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[W]e see it as the State proceeding with the assistance of the most qualified and prepared lawyer available to it....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.