Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 623 SO2D 178 - State v. Hooker

State v. Hooker’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 2015

17 state decisions

100199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 436 So. 2d 471 - State v. Sutton · Griffin v. Texas · 436 So. 2d 475 - State v. Kahey · State v. Pitcher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Mistrial is a drastic remedy which should be granted only when the defendant suffers such substantial prejudice that he has been deprived of any reasonable expectation of a fair trial. Failure to comply with discovery merits mistrial only when the State's conduct substantially affects the defendant's right to prepare a defense. Exclusion of the undisclosed evidence is sometimes an appropriate remedy.... However, it is not warranted unless there is substantial prejudice to the defendant. Such prejudice could consist of surprise or a showing that the undisclosed evidence would have changed the defense strategy. Trial courts may offset the effect of late disclosure by calling a recess or granting a continuance. The trial court has wide discretion in fashioning a remedy. The propriety of the remedy depends on the circumstances of the case. State v. Hooker, 623 So.2d 178, 182 (La.App. 2d Cir.1993). Citations omitted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the unauthorized entering of any dwelling, vehicle, watercraft, or other structure, movable or immovable, or any cemetery, with the intent to commit a felony or any theft therein[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.