Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 623 SO2D 204 - State v. Grant

State v. Grant’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 2013
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2013

8 state decisions

30199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Jacobs · State v. Williams · State v. Smith · 599 So. 2d 326 - State v. Bellamy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “All persons concerned in the commission of a crime, whether present or absent, and whether they directly commit the act constituting the offense, aid and abet in its commission, or directly or indirectly counsel or procure'another to commit the crime, are principals.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(2)(a) When the offender is engaged in the perpetration or attempted perpetration of .... armed robbery,.... simple robbery, .... even though he has no intent to kill or inflict great bodily harm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.