623 So. 2d 369 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2014 · most notably 728 So. 2d 192 - Davis v. State (1997), Ex Parte Dobyne (1995)
38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Illinois v. Gates · Brinegar v. United States · Arizona v. Fulminante
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'When reviewing the erroneous admission of an involuntary confession, the appellate court, as it does with the admission of other forms of improperly admitted evidence, simply reviews the remainder of the evidence against the defendant to determine whether the admission of the confession was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. '”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“` 499 U.S. at 310 , 111 S.Ct. at 1265 , 113 L.Ed.2d at 332 . (Emphasis added.) "In order for the harmless error doctrine to be applied in this situation, the evidence against the accused must be overwhelming.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“All extra-judicial statements are deemed involuntary.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.