State v. Bartee’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2006
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on California v. Hodari D. · Perez v. State · 579 So. 2d 902 - State v. Arnold · 568 So. 2d 523 - State v. Bartee · 592 So. 2d 1099 - State v. Perez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although the Court assumed that the police pursuit was a `show of authority' calling upon Hodari D. to halt, the Court held that Hodari D. had not been seized as contemplated by the fourth amendment at the time of the abandonment, since at this point in time, he had not been tackled or otherwise `submitted to the show of authority.' Therefore, the recovery of the cocaine that had been abandoned while he was running was not the fruit of an unlawful seizure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.