London v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 576 So. 2d 281 - State v. Williams · 564 So. 2d 480 - Cresswell v. State · State v. Jimeno · 557 So. 2d 899 - Caracciolo v. State · 602 So. 2d 914 - Florida Bar re: Advisory Opinion
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]ecause the trial court retains discretion in classifying and sentencing a defendant as a habitual offender”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.