Taylor v. Broadmoor Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 488 So. 2d 934 - Berry v. Holston Well Service, Inc. · Bourgeois v. Puerto Rican Marine Management, Inc. · Akers v. Rent-A-Car · Crochet v. Westminster City Center Prop. · 537 So. 2d 381 - Rogers v. Gervais Favrot Co., Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This is significant in that there is some authority for a “temporal requirement” in the “two-contract” statutory employer defense. “The ease law on the two-contract defense has established a requirement that the general contraetor/principal must prove that he entered into a general contract to do certain work prior to entering his contract with the plaintiffs employer to perform a part of that work.” Id. at 676 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“theory of defense, a general contractor is exempt from tort liability to a subcontractor's employee if the general contractor subcontracts for the performance of all or part of the general contract. Taylor v. Broadmoor Corp., 623 So.2d 674 (La.App. 4 Cir.1993). Thus, the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“, undertakes to execute any work, which is a part of his trade, business, or occupation or which he had contracted to perform, and contracts with any person, in this Section referred to as the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.