Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 623 So. 2d 823 - Woolfork v. State

623 So. 2d 823 - Woolfork v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2006
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 597 So. 2d 431 - Chapman v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]dding the words `as charged' [to the jury verdict form did] not help the situation because the charge was also incorrectly worded.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 940 So. 2d 551 - Freudenberger v. State
  2. “guilty of obstructing or opposing an officer with violence and evidencing prejudice based upon the race of the victim, as charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 940 So. 2d 551 - Freudenberger v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.