Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

623 So. 2d 869

Storman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 17, 1993

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1993-09-17

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 1994

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-09-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Anthony Storman appeals the judgment and sentence entered following his nolo con-tendere plea pursuant to his written plea agreement with the State. Our review of the record reveals discrepancies between the plea agreement, the oral pronouncements at the sentencing hearing, and the written judgment. All of these matters could and should have been directed to the trial court for clarification and correction, which would have eliminated the necessity for this appeal.

¶2The appellant’s convictions are affirmed. However, the sentences on Counts I, IV, and V are reversed and this cause is remanded for resentencing in accordance with the plea agreement.

¶3AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED for resentencing.

GOSHORN, GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.
/623/so2d/869 · .json · Public domain