623 So. 2d 955 - Stonecipher v. Kornhaus’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 2016
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Short v. Columbus Rubber and Gasket Co. · Smith v. Sanders · 457 So. 2d 941 - Dennis v. Searle · Koch v. H. & S. DEVELOPMENT CO. · 603 So. 2d 824 - O'CAIN v. Harvey Freeman and Sons, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) A vendor of land who conceals or fails to disclose to his vendee any condition, whether natural or artificial, which involves unreasonable risk to persons on the land, is subject to liability to the vendee and others upon the land with the consent of the vendee or his subvendee for physical harm caused by the condition after the vendee has taken possession, if (a) the vendee does not know or have reason to know of the condition or the risk involved, and (b) the vendor knows or has reason to know of the condition, and realizes or should realize the risk involved, and has reason to believe that the vendee will not discover the condition or realize the risk. (2) If the vendor actively conceals the condition, the liability stated in Subsection (1) continues until the vendee discovers it and has reasonable opportunity to take effective precautions against it. Otherwise the liability continues only until the vendee has had reasonable opportunity to discover the condition and to take such precautions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“clause in the contract exempted them from liability pertaining to the condition of the property. In accepting the appellees argument, the Mississippi Supreme Court concluded that the Stoneciphers were bound by the mutually agreed upon terms of the contract. Id. The Stoneciphers, therefore, were precluded from maintaining suit against the vendors. Id. at 964 . ¶ 9. Just as in Stonecipher , Crase signed a contract with an”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Crase v. Hahn“1) A misrepresentation or omission of fact; 2) That the representation or omission is material or significant; 3) The failure to exercise reasonable care on the part of the defendant; 4) Reasonable reliance on the misrepresentation or omission; and 5) Damages as a direst result of such reasonable reliance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.