Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 623 SW2D 102 - Buckner v. Carlton

Buckner v. Carlton’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2017

1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

601981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Imbler v. Pachtman · Cort v. Ash · Pierson v. Ray · Butz v. Economou · Stump v. Sparkman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On its face, the Tennessee Tip Statute is clearly intended to protect such employees by forbidding employers from keeping them tips. While the statute contains no express indication of legislative intent to create or deny a private right of action, a private action is consistent with the purpose of the legislation, and indeed complements the remedy in the statute by providing a mechanism to make employees whole. Consequently, we affirm the tidal court’s determination that the plaintiffs could pursue a private cause of action under the Tennessee Tip Statute.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The general rule is that testimony given in a judicial proceeding, if pertinent thereto, is protected by an absolute privilege even though given maliciously and with knowledge of its falsity. And accordingly, it is also the general rule that no civil action for damages lies for false testimony or for subornation of false testimony or for conspiracy to give or procure false testimony.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “no overt acts [in furtherance of the alleged conspiracy] separate and apart from the false testimony.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.