Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 624 A2D 485 - State v. Ward

State v. Ward’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 2013
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2013

8 state decisions

40199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Franks v. Delaware · United States v. Ventresca · State v. Appleton · State v. Knowlton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in keeping with the deference to be accorded the decision of a neutral magistrate to issue a search warrant, the affidavit should be read positively to determine whether it can fairly be read to support the complaint justice’s action. [B]oth magistrates and courts must test the affidavit “in a common sense and realistic fashion.... Technical requirements of elaborate specificity once exacted under common law pleadings have no proper place in this area.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.