Martinez v. Blum’s Empirical Analysis
624 F.2d 1 · 1980
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 2000
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Goldberg v. Kelly · Dandridge v. Williams · Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex · Addington v. Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'there is simply no constitutional guarantee that all executive decisionmaking must comply with standards that assure error-free determinations'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.