Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 624 F.2d 1112 - Breest v. Perrin

Breest v. Perrin’s Empirical Analysis

624 F.2d 1112 · 1980

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
5
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently February 2017

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions

1301980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Neil v. Biggers · Giglio v. United States · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois · United States v. Antone · Taylor v. Lombard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e shall first assess the nature and strength of the incriminating evidence, compared to that of contradicting evidence. We shall then focus on the thrust of Carita's testimony, the extent to which he had been subject to impeachment at trial, and the extent to which he would have been rendered more vulnerable had the full story of his understanding with the sheriff been revealed. Finally, we shall have to determine whether any such additional vulnerability could in any reasonable likelihood have caused the jury to bring in a verdict of not guilty.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “testimony that fits like the final piece of a puzzle into an increasingly clear pattern needs a much stronger rebuttal than one that stands almost alone as a purported representation of the whole.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.