Crider v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
624 F.2d 15 · 1980
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 2020
5 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1381 (§ 1601 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 416 (§ 216 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Livingston v. Califano
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the event of frequent loss of eyesight . . . `would fairly eliminate' all of the alternative employment possibilities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hines v. Barnhart“that Crider could not perform substantial gainful employment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hines v. Barnhart“heightened duty of care and responsibility”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.