Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 624 F.2d 557 - Wright v. United States

Wright v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

624 F.2d 557 · 1980

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
6
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 5 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Downs-Morgan v. United States (1985), Major v. State (2002)

27 federal appellate · 5 district · 11 state decisions

2201980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 825 (§ 305 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · North Carolina v. Alford · Brady v. United States · McCarthy v. United States · Hill v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In a section 2255 motion, a petitioner has the burden of sustaining his contentions by a preponderance of the evidence.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the motion and the files and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a plea's possible enhancing effect on a subsequent sentence is merely a collateral consequence”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.