Rosenberg v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis
624 F.2d 659 · 1980
Citation profile
49 federal appellate · 4 district · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 107 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Scholes v. Lehmann (1995), United States v. Keplinger (1985)
49 federal appellate · 4 district · 16 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Securities & Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co. · United States v. Miller · Acosta v. United States · Cunningham v. Brown · Securities & Exchange Commission v. Glenn W. Turner Enterprises Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 107 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any person in a position to attest to the authenticity of certain records is competent to lay the foundation for the admissibility of the records; he need not have been the preparer of the record, nor must he personally attest to the accuracy of the information contained in the records.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) The records must be kept pursuant to some routine procedure designed to assure their accuracy, (2) they must be created for motives that would tend to assure accuracy (preparation for litigation, for example, is not such a motive), and (3) they must not themselves be mere accumulations of hearsay or uninformed opinion.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“to some identifiable property which can be traced back to the original property acquired by fraud”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.