Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 624 F.2d 695 - Williams v. Kelley

Williams v. Kelley’s Empirical Analysis

624 F.2d 695 · 1980

Citation profile

121
cited by 121 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

74 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 121 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2015 · most notably Parratt v. Taylor (1981), Samples v. City of Atlanta (1988)

74 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

10401980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · Monroe v. Pape · Paul v. Davis · Imbler v. Pachtman · Baker v. McCollan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 121 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... such factors as the need for the application of force, the relationship between the need and the amount of force that was used, the extent of injury inflicted, and whether force was applied in a good faith effort to maintain or restore discipline or maliciously and sadistically for the very purpose of causing harm.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'to raise an ordinary tort by a government agent to the stature of a violation of the Constitution.'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “sufficiently egregious as to be 'constitutionally' tortious”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.