Packard v. OCA, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
624 F.3d 726 · 2010
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc. · Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc. v. Berner · Ewell v. Daggs · Lewis v. Davis · American National Insurance Co. v. Tabor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no dentist [shall] permit or allow himself, his practice of dentistry, his professional identification, or his services to be used or made use of, directly, or indirectly, or in any manner whatsoever, so as to create or tend to create the opportunity for the unauthorized or unlawful practice of dentistry by any person, firm, or corporation or for the practice of dentistry in violation of any provision of the Texas Dental Practice Act or any rule, regulation, or order of the Board.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.