Young v. Hawks’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 2024
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tucker v. Pulaski Federal Savings & Loan Association · 58 Wis. 2d 99 - Mutual Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Wisconsin Wire Works · Weaver v. Blue Cross-Blue Shield · Moore v. Kiljander · Continental Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Fetter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e need not consider issues which are not supported by proper citation of authority and cogent argument or which are not clearly defined.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage““[A] district court may resolve a motion for summary judgment in favor of either party, even though only one has filed such a motion.” Young v. Hawks, Wyo., 624 P.2d 235, 239 (1981).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.