Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 624 P2D 685 - Dupuis v. Nielson

Dupuis v. Nielson’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
April 1999
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 29 Utah 2d 101 - Transamerica Insurance Company v. Barnes · 8 Utah 2d 42 - Bodon Ex Rel. Bodon v. Suhrmann · Allstate Insurance Co. v. Ivie · Street v. Farmers Insurance Exchange · Jones v. Transamerica Insurance Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To the extent that plaintiff would receive double recovery of a particular type of damage, an adjustment of the judgment in this case was appropriate. However, the judgment may only be reduced to the extent it specifically and identifiably included special damages of the same types as those for which no-fault benefits had previously been received. . . . Defendant is not entitled to a reduction of plaintiff's award of general damages to offset no-fault insurance payments for different types or categories of damages.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.