Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 624 SO2D 100 - Harris v. State

Harris v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Perma Research & Development Co. v. Singer Co. · Albertson v. Tj Stevenson & Company Inc · Wright v. State · 578 So. 2d 617 - Harris v. State · Minnifield v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order for a contested fact to require an evidentiary hearing it must be material. Moreover, where an affidavit is belied by unimpeachable documentary evidence in the record such as, for example, a transcript or written statements of the affiant to the contrary, to the extent that the court can conclude that the affidavit is a sham, no hearing is required.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “To prove his right to an out-of-time appeal, the movant must show by a preponderance of the evidence that he asked his attorney to appeal within the time allowed for giving notice of an appeal. Moreover, the movant must show that the attorney failed to perfect the appeal and that such failure was through no fault of the movant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.