624 So. 2d 32 - State v. Ford’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2003
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Pitcher · 459 So. 2d 72 - State v. McKethan · 598 So. 2d 454 - State v. Powell · 607 So. 2d 872 - State v. Barnes · State v. Brossette
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When a judge sentences within the designated sentence range, he need only put on the record the sentence, the proper grid cell for the sentence imposed, and how he determined that the cell was the proper cell to be used. La.S.G. § 201(B) and (C); State v. Barnes, 607 So.2d 872 (La.App.2d Cir.1992).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.