Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

624 So. 2d 405

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 24, 1993

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1993-09-24

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 2009

5 state decisions

Relies on State v. Tito

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-09-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Laura Brown appeals her sentences imposed in case number 90-9615, contending the scoresheet contains numerous errors that, if corrected, would result in a lower permitted range. The state has conceded that there are errors in the scoresheet. Accordingly, we reverse Ms. Brown’s sentences in case number 90-9615, and remand for resentencing within the maximum range permitted by the guidelines, after recalculating the scoresheet. In this regard, the trial court should be guided by State v. Tito, 616 So.2d 39 (Fla.1993).

¶2Ms. Brown also contends that the trial court impermissibly extended her probation in case numbers 90-9616, 90-9617, 90-9618, and 90-12265. We do not have jurisdiction to review this issue because Ms. Brown failed to appeal these cases. She may raise this issue in a motion for posteonviction relief.

¶3Case number 90-9615 is reversed and remanded for resentencing.

RYDER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
/624/so2d/405 · .json · Public domain