Irwin v. Blake’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Iverson v. Xpert Tune, Inc. · 575 So. 2d 43 - Ex Parte Coker · American Family Care, Inc. v. Irwin · Boykin v. Arthur Andersen & Co. · 407 So. 2d 125 - Ultracashmere House, Ltd. v. Meyer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Rule 37(b)(2)(C), Ala. R. Civ. P., authorizes the trial court to enter a default judgment against a party who fails to comply with a discovery order. In Iverson v. Xpert Tune, Inc., 553 So.2d 82, 87 (Ala.1989), the Court stated: “ ‘We recognize that the sanction of dismissal is the most severe sanction that a court may apply [against- a plaintiff]. Judicial discretion must be carefully exercised to assure that the situation warrants the imposition of such a sanction.... We have held that “willfulness” on the part of the noncomplying party is a key factor supporting a dismissal. If one party has acted with willful and deliberate disregard of reasonable and necessary requests for the efficient administration of justice, the application of even so stringent a sanction as dismissal is fully justified....”’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.