¶1AFFIRMED. See Wright v. Wright, 431 So.2d 177 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Our decision is without prejudice to appellant to apply to the trial court for modification of the term of rehabilitative alimony, if appropriate. See Saez-Ortiz v. Saez-Ortiz, 560 So.2d 1375 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); O’Neal v. O’Neal, 410 So.2d 1369 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).
624 So. 2d 863
Thompson v. Thompson
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 8, 1993
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1993-10-08
Relies on O'Neal v. O'Neal · 431 So. 2d 177 - Wright v. Wright · 560 So. 2d 1375 - Saez-Ortiz v. Saez-Ortiz
Decided 1993-10-08