Kaynard National Labor Relations Board v. Palby Lingerie Inc’s Empirical Analysis
625 F.2d 1047 · 1980
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 8 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably Asseo v. Pan American Grain Co. (1986), Gottfried v. Frankel (1987)
25 federal appellate · 8 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Republic Aviation Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board · Corallo v. United States · Beth Israel Hospital v. National Labor Relations Board · City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey · Angle v. Sacks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“active and open union supporters ... risk(s) a serious adverse impact on employee interest in unionization.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“"The Board shall have power, upon issuance of a complaint as provided in subsection (b) of this section charging that any person has engaged in or is engaging in an unfair labor practice, to petition any United States district court, within any district wherein the unfair labor practice in question is alleged to have occurred or wherein such person resides or transacts business, for appropriate temporary relief or restraining order. Upon the filing of any such petition the court shall cause notice thereof to be served upon such person, and thereupon shall have jurisdiction to grant to the Board such temporary relief or restraining order as it deems just and proper."”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]ith respect to issues of fact, the Regional Director should be given the benefit of the doubt... and on questions of law, the Board's view should be sustained unless the court is convinced that it is wrong.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.