United States v. Barham’s Empirical Analysis
625 F.2d 1221 · 1980
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2017
16 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 471 (Counterfeit Deterrence Act of 1992)
Relies on Giglio v. United States · Abney v. United States · Alford v. United States · United States v. Dinitz · Lee v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`[T]he prosecutor's conduct did not amount to prosecutorial overreaching or bad faith and that in any event double jeopardy bars a retrial after conviction only when the conviction is reversed for insufficiency of the evidence.' United States v. Barham , 625 F.2d 1221 (5th Cir.1980).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.