Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 625 F.2d 240 - Johnson v. Mateer

Johnson v. Mateer’s Empirical Analysis

625 F.2d 240 · 1980

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
4
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably United States Schumer v. Hughes Aircraft Company (1995), Hernandez v. City of Los Angeles (1980)

16 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

1901980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Monroe v. Pape · Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Stone v. Powell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Plaintiff’s] failure to articulate the basis for his civil rights claim at the pleading stage should not have been fatal to his claim, as his affidavit filed in opposition to the motion for summary judgment made factual allegations regarding property deprivation and harassment.... The district court should have construed the affidavit as a request pursuant to rule 15(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to amend the pleadings out of time and should have determined whether, based on the contents of the affidavit read with the complaint, triable issues of fact existed.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.