United States v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis
625 F.2d 543 · 1980
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3150 (Bail Reform Act of 1984)
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Berger v. United States · Trammel v. United States · Cataldo v. United States · United States v. Lichenstein
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The general rule that allegations and proof must correspond is based on two requirements: `(1) that the accused shall be definitely informed as to the charges against him, so that he may be enabled to present his defense and not be taken by surprise by the evidence offered at trial; and (2) that he may be protected against another prosecution for the same offense.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Sword“`The evaluation of a claim of variance ... involves application of a two-step analysis: first, to ascertain whether there was in fact a variance between indictment and proof, and second, to determine whether the variance was prejudicial.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Sword
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.