United States v. Hinderman’s Empirical Analysis
625 F.2d 994 · 1980
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably State v. Brigandi (1982), United States v. Blankenship (1985)
17 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7205
Relies on Lubin v. Allison · United States v. Pomponio · Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer · Cephus v. United States · United States v. Malinowski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he prosecution must establish a prima facie case by its own evidence before the defendant may be put to his defense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he government’s case-in-chief should not be treated as an experiment that can be cured after the defendant has, by motion, identified the failures. But the trial court must be vested with discretion to permit reopening when mere inadvertence or some other compelling circumstance ... justifies a reopening and no substantial prejudice will occur.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. United States v. Doe
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.