Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 625 F.3d 1014 - Dodge v. Robinson

Dodge v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis

625 F.3d 1014 · 2010

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
June 2025
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Estelle v. McGuire · Brown v. Ohio · Missouri v. Hunter · Albernaz v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Since we can dispose of both claims on the merits, we do not address the issue of procedural default.”); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (b)(2) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.