Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 625 FSUPP2D 391 - Alcala v. Texas Webb County

Alcala v. Texas Webb County’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
4
states following
September 2021
most recently cited

1 district · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Doggett v. United States · Landis v. North American Co. · United States v. Kordel · Kirchberg v. Feenstra

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the interest of the plaintiffs in proceeding expeditiously with [the] litigation or any particular aspect of it, and the potential prejudice to plaintiffs of a delay; (2) the burden which any particular aspect of the proceedings may impose on defendants; (3) the convenience of the court in the manage ment of its cases, and the efficient use of judicial resources; (4) the interests of persons not parties to the civil litigation; and (5) the interest of the public in the pending civil and criminal litigation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Thus, whether to stay a civil action pending resolution of a parallel criminal prosecution is not a matter of constitutional right, but, rather, one of court discretion, that should be exercised when the interests of justice so require.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[EJven after an indictment has issued ... to warrant a stay, a defendant must make a strong showing that the two proceedings will ... overlap.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.