Morgan v. SPEAKEASY, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 203 · 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 29 U.S.C. § 216 · 29 U.S.C. § 260
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Rutherford Food Corp. v. McComb · Goldberg v. Whitaker House Cooperative, Inc. · Dean Foods Company v. Ben Brancel, Secretary of the Wisconsin Dept. Of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection · Bonnette v. California Health & Welfare Agency
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any person acting directly or indirectly in the interest of an employer in relation to an employee and includes a public agency ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“directed to the same business objective or to similar objectives in which the group has an interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.