Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 625 P2D 816 - Phillips v. State

Phillips v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
7
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably Shamaeizadeh v. Cunigan (2003), State v. Flippo (2002)

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 24 state decisions

16019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mincey v. Arizona · United States v. Radio Television News Directors Ass'n · McClain v. State · State v. Chaney · Hardin v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “unequivocal, specific and intelligently given, and not the product of duress or coercion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Mike Yakasoff evidently consented to Little’s [the officer’s] initial entry in order to have the mystery of the dead body resolved. The subsequent entries and the investigative search were all made for the same purpose. While it might have been prudent for the police to have obtained a specific consent to each new intrusion, we cannot say that their failure to do so vitiated Mike Yakasoff’s implied continuing consent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “lack of objection to subsequent closely related entries and searches”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.