Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

625 So. 2d 1024

In re Trichel

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 1, 1993

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1993-10-01

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 2000

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-10-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Disciplinary Proceeding

PER CURIAM.

¶2Upon review of the record of the disciplinary board’s findings and recommendations and the record filed herein, it is the decision of the court that the disciplinary board’s recommendations be adopted.

¶3The disciplinary board found that Respondent had violated Rules 1.3 and 1.4 of the Rules of Professional Conduct for having neglected legal matters entrusted to him and having been seriously neglectful of his duty to respond to the inquiries of his client, the Shreveport Bar Association, and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel.

¶4Accordingly, it is ordered that N. Martin Trichel be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months from the finality of this decision, with that sanction suspended and Mr. Trichel being placed on probation for six months subject to fulfillment of conditions set forth by the disciplinary board.

¶5SUSPENSION AND PROBATION ORDERED.

CALOGERO, C.J., not on panel.
/625/so2d/1024 · .json · Public domain