Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

625 So. 2d 1178

Vo v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · decided 1993-05-28

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 1996

4 state decisions

Relies on 612 So. 2d 1323 - Vo v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-05-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ON RETURN TO REMAND

TAYLOR, Judge.

¶2The appellant, Ky Van Vo, was convicted of murder and of assault in the first degree. We remanded this cause to the Circuit Court for Mobile County because the evidence presented at trial did not bring the offense under the statute defining assault in the first degree but did prove that the offense constituted assault in the second degree. We instructed the court to set aside the appellant’s conviction for assault in the first degree and to enter a judgment of guilty of assault in the second degree. Vo v. State, 612 So.2d 1323 (Ala.Cr.App.1992). The state petitioned the Alabama Supreme Court for certiorari review; that court denied the petition on February 19, 1993. The return to remand was filed in this case on April 14, 1993.

¶3The trial court has complied with our directions and has entered a judgment of guilty of assault in the second degree. It has further sentenced the appellant for assault in the second degree to a term of 10 years’ imprisonment. The judgment in this cause is due to be affirmed.

¶4AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.
/625/so2d/1178 · .json · Public domain