625 So. 2d 1195 - Fleming v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2003
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · Ex Parte Frith · 354 So. 2d 1172 - Conley v. State · 395 So. 2d 164 - Bland v. State · 35 Ala. App. 111 - Anderson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[T]he trial court was not 'apprised of the basis for the objection with sufficient particularity to allow an informed decision to be made on the particular legal issue involved.' Bland v. State , 395 So.2d 164 , 168 (Ala.Cr.App. 1981) (emphasis added). 'The statement of specific grounds of objection waives all grounds not specified, and the trial court will not be put in error on grounds not assigned at trial.' Ex parte Frith , 526 So.2d 880 , 882 (Ala. 1987)."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Callahan v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.