Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

625 So. 2d 158

State v. Conrad

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 1, 1993

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1993-10-01

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 2014

5 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-10-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Granted in part; denied in part.

¶2The record of sentencing does not demonstrate adequate compliance with La.Code Crim.Proc. art. 894.1, nor does it provide a factual basis for imposition of the present sentence. Therefore, the sentence is vacated, and the case is remanded for resentenc-ing.

¶3Upon resentencing, the district court should comply with La.Code Crim.Proc. art. 894.1, as amended by Act 22 of 1991, which requires consideration of the sentencing guidelines promulgated by the Louisiana Sentencing Commission in determining the appropriate sentence to be imposed.

¶4Granted in part with order.

MARCUS, J., not on panel.
/625/so2d/158 · .json · Public domain