Krampe v. Krampe’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Aguilar v. Wilson · 613 So. 2d 228 - Aguilar v. Wilson · 607 So. 2d 837 - Aguilar v. Wilson · 533 So. 2d 46 - Pearce v. POWER & TELEPHONE OF KENTUCKY, INC. · 544 So. 2d 705 - Hargett v. Hargett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the court shall use its discretion ... but in no event shall it be less than the highest amount set forth in the schedule.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"Our research has turned up only one case in which an appellate court has held that a trial court was required to issue oral or written reasons for its choice of an award of child support when the parents' income exceeded the highest amount in R.S. 9:315.14. In Aguilar v. Wilson, 607 So.2d 837 (La.App. 1st Cir.1992), the First Circuit held that the trial court was required to render oral or written reasons if it awarded child support in an instance where the parents' incomes exceeded the guideline maximum. We decline to follow Aguilar. R.S. 9:315.1(B) applies where the guidelines specify a particular award and the trial court chooses not to follow the requirement of the guideline. In the present case, the only applicable requirement of the guidelines that the trial court was obligated to meet was that it not award `less than the highest amount set forth in the schedule.' LSA-R.S. 9:315.10(B). Since the trial court awarded more than the highest amount of the schedule, we are not faced with a question of the trial court's deviation from the schedule. Accordingly, we do not find the trial court was required to render detailed reasons such as that referred to in Aguilar. Rather, we find that our task on appellate review in this instance is to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion. LSA-R.S. 9:315.10(B)."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Parents have an obligation to support, maintain, and educate their children and should maintain their children in the same status as if the parents were not separated or divorced; this support shall be granted in proportion to the needs of the child and the circumstances of the parent who is to pay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hector v. Raymond
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.