State v. Donahue’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 1988
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Holt · State v. Longmeyer · State v. Harris · State v. Platt · State v. Franklin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Inconsistencies in testimony are fact questions left to the determination of the trier of fact. An accused is not entitled to an acquittal and such inconsistencies do not render such testimony insufficient as a matter of law. The weight and credibility of such testimony is within the province of the trier of fact. (Citations omitted.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ofield
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.