Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 626 F.2d 1029 - Washington-Baltimore Newspaper Guild Local of Newspaper Guild v. Washington Post Company

Washington-Baltimore Newspaper Guild Local of Newspaper Guild v. Washington Post Company’s Empirical Analysis

626 F.2d 1029 · 1980

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
January 2025
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 9 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably Shepherd v. American Broadcasting Companies (1995), Broderick v. Donaldson (2006)

20 federal appellate · 9 district ·

26019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · Schauffler ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Local 1291, International Longshoremen's Ass'n · V. T. A., Inc. v. Airco, Inc. · United States Steel Corp. v. United Mine Workers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On appeal, the petitioner must prove that the trial judge abused his discretion in refusing to order civil contempt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “only discussed arbitration as it applied to the then pending employee discharge disputes”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “of the same character that were factually before the court at that time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.