Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 626 F.2d 1084 - Riddick ex rel. Riddick v. D'Elia

Riddick ex rel. Riddick v. D'Elia’s Empirical Analysis

626 F.2d 1084 · 1980

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
November 1996
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Stanley v. Illinois · Dandridge v. Williams · Weinberger v. Salfi · Hagans v. Lavine · Bell v. Burson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A relative or other person to whom certification of payment is made on behalf of a beneficiary as representative payee shall ... apply the payments certified to him on behalf of a beneficiary only for the use and benefit of such beneficiary in the manner and for the purposes determined by him to be in the beneficiary’s best interest. 20 C.F.R. § 404.1603 (emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a constitutional claim cannot be deemed too insubstantial to support federal jurisdiction unless it is virtually certain from prior Supreme Court cases arising out of a substantially similar context that the claim has no hope of success.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “income and resources of [the] child or relative.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.