Sekaquaptewa v. MacDonald’s Empirical Analysis
626 F.2d 113 · 1980
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably Clinton v. Babbitt (1999), Sidney v. Zah (1983)
18 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Michel v. United States · Roberts v. Louisiana · Dawson Chemical Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co. · New York v. Penn Central Transportation Co. · United States v. Creek Nation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“appeals from any eligibility determination of the Relocation Commission ... shall be brought in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.