Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 626 F.2d 145 - Calhoun v. Bailar

Calhoun v. Bailar’s Empirical Analysis

626 F.2d 145 · 1980

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
11
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 1 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently September 2013 · most notably Xiaoguang Gu v. Gonzales (2006), Gallant v. Heckler (1984)

33 federal appellate · 1 district · 12 state decisions — followed in 11 states

4001980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Infelice v. United States · Asarco, Inc. v. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in administrative discharge cases is limited 'to a determination that the applicable procedures have been complied with and that the dismissal was supported by substantial evidence and was not arbitrary and capricious.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “it is not the hearsay nature per se of the proffered evidence that is significant, it is its probative value, reliability and the fairness of its use that are determinative.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “irrelevant, immaterial or unduly repetitious evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.