United States v. Milestone’s Empirical Analysis
626 F.2d 264 · 1980
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently December 2012 · most notably United States v. Mosley (1992), United States v. Wellington (1985)
21 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Wainwright v. Sykes · Stirone v. United States · Michel v. United States · Bain Jr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any amendment that transforms an indictment from one that does not state an offense into one that does”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“any change that tends to increase the defendant's burden at trial.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“although petitioner did not raise this issue on direct appeal, collateral review is available under Sec. 2255 to correct jurisdictional errors”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.