Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 626 F.2d 345 - Clay v. Miller

Clay v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

626 F.2d 345 · 1980

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2016 · most notably Wilson v. Seiter (1991), Ruiz v. Estelle (1982)

21 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

2401980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sosna v. Iowa · Robins v. United States · Cleveland v. United States · Sostre v. McGinnis · Rhem v. Malcolm

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In deciding whether conditions at a jail are so onerously burdensome as to reach constitutional dimensions, courts must look at the totality of the circumstances, including the extent to which the restrictions adversely affect the mental or physical health of the inmate. See, e. g., Dorrough v. Hogan, 563 F.2d 1259, 1263 (4th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 850 , 99 S.Ct. 153 , 58 L.Ed.2d 153 (1978). See also Kirby v. Blackledge, supra. There has been no showing that Clay’s mental or physical health was threatened as a result of not being provided more space or facilities than that provided by the day room area. We agree with the district court that the conditions at Halifax County Jail satisfy minimum constitutional standards.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[The named plaintiff's] denomination of this action as a class action does not save his request for injunctive relief because he was not a member of the class he purported to represent at the time class certification was denied by the district court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]t is true that, in certain circumstances, restricting inmates' opportunities for physical exercise constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.