Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 626 F.2d 616 - United States v. Schmidt

United States v. Schmidt’s Empirical Analysis

626 F.2d 616 · 1980

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
3
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably United States v. Big Crow (1990), United States v. Segal (1981)

21 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

19019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1112 · 18 U.S.C. § 1153

Relies on Glasser v. United States · California v. Civil Aeronautics Board · McClain v. United States · United States v. Guillette · Commonwealth v. Root

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “acted grossly negligently in that he acted with a wanton or reckless disregard for human life, knowing that his conduct was a threat to the lives of others or having knowledge of such circumstances as could reasonably have enabled him to foresee the peril to which his act might subject others.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]e believe that proof of some more direct causal connection between act and result should be required in criminal cases than would be sufficient to uphold liability in tort.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the verdict of the jury must be sustained if there is substantial evidence in the record to support it, taking the view of the evidence most favorable to the government.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.