Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 626 F.2d 684 - United States v. Mackey

United States v. Mackey’s Empirical Analysis

626 F.2d 684 · 1980

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
March 2007
most recently cited

38 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2007 · most notably Robbins v. California (1981), United States v. Martino (1981)

38 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

430198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113

Relies on Katz v. United States · Carroll v. United States · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Rakas v. Illinois · Chambers v. Maroney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) paper bag is among the least private of containers. It is easily torn, it cannot be latched, and, to a greater extent than most containers, its contents can frequently be discerned merely by holding or feeling the container.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “did not possess a sufficient privacy interest in the paper bag to justify imposing the warrant requirement of (United States v.) Chadwick (1977, 433 U.S. 1 , 97 S.Ct. 2476, 53 L.Ed.2d 538) and Sanders.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “(A) person's expectations of privacy in personal luggage are substantially greater than in an automobile.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.